9.2 Biases: Difference between revisions
More actions
No edit summary |
// via Wikitext Extension for VSCode |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Cover|9.2 Biases}} | |||
As social creatures, humans make decisions in the context of their social environment. This often leads to decisions that tend to conform with the group or obey those in authority, and to judgments that overemphasize the role of individual differences in explaining people's behaviors. We provoke a discussion on the implications of these cognitive biases to society and encourage empathy when judging others. | As social creatures, humans make decisions in the context of their social environment. This often leads to decisions that tend to conform with the group or obey those in authority, and to judgments that overemphasize the role of individual differences in explaining people's behaviors. We provoke a discussion on the implications of these cognitive biases to society and encourage empathy when judging others. | ||
== The Lesson in Context == | == The Lesson in Context == | ||
| Line 10: | Line 8: | ||
This lesson is in the middle our "heuristics and biases" series and tends to be one of the more popular lessons in the course. It focusses on people's "hot" biases that are more emotionally or socially driven. Unfortunately, people that know about these biases are generally ''not'' actually less likely to fall into them. We choose to teach the students about them anyways. | This lesson is in the middle our "heuristics and biases" series and tends to be one of the more popular lessons in the course. It focusses on people's "hot" biases that are more emotionally or socially driven. Unfortunately, people that know about these biases are generally ''not'' actually less likely to fall into them. We choose to teach the students about them anyways. | ||
<!-- Expandable section relating this lesson to | <!-- Expandable section relating this lesson to other lessons. --> | ||
{{Expand|Relation to Earlier Lessons | {{Expand|Relation to Other Lessons| | ||
'''Earlier Lessons''' | |||
{{ContextLesson|8.1 Orders of Understanding}} | {{ContextLesson|8.1 Orders of Understanding}} | ||
{{ContextRelation|Orders of Understanding is about how each event arises from multiple influences, some more important than others. Human behavior, for instance, is affected by both individual differences and by circumstance or context, including pressures to conform and obey, and we often overestimate the former and underestimate the latter (FAE).}} | {{ContextRelation|Orders of Understanding is about how each event arises from multiple influences, some more important than others. Human behavior, for instance, is affected by both individual differences and by circumstance or context, including pressures to conform and obey, and we often overestimate the former and underestimate the latter (FAE).}} | ||
{{ContextLesson|9.1 Heuristics}} | {{ContextLesson|9.1 Heuristics}} | ||
{{ContextRelation|The first lesson on H&B is on "cold" biases around numbers and frequencies. The second lesson (this one) is on "hot" biases, more emotion and value-laden thinking. Both involve heuristics, strategies for making quick judgments that can be useful in some contexts but can also go awry.}} | {{ContextRelation|The first lesson on H&B is on "cold" biases around numbers and frequencies. The second lesson (this one) is on "hot" biases, more emotion and value-laden thinking. Both involve heuristics, strategies for making quick judgments that can be useful in some contexts but can also go awry.}} | ||
}} | {{Line}} | ||
'''Later Lessons''' | |||
{{ContextLesson|10.1 Confirmation Bias}} | {{ContextLesson|10.1 Confirmation Bias}} | ||
{{ContextRelation|Confirmation bias is a broader form of bias in which people tend to look for and believe evidence or arguments supporting what they already believe or expect, and to neglect or dismiss evidence and arguments against what they believe or expect. It can exacerbate other biases, including status quo bias, temporal discounting, and/or the fundamental attribution error.}} | {{ContextRelation|Confirmation bias is a broader form of bias in which people tend to look for and believe evidence or arguments supporting what they already believe or expect, and to neglect or dismiss evidence and arguments against what they believe or expect. It can exacerbate other biases, including status quo bias, temporal discounting, and/or the fundamental attribution error.}} | ||
| Line 26: | Line 24: | ||
{{ContextRelation|Scenario Planning involves considering four different possible future scenarios. It is one strategy that may reduce status quo bias and temporal discounting by making more salient a variety of possible futures, and how they may differ from the present in both desirable and undesirable ways.}} | {{ContextRelation|Scenario Planning involves considering four different possible future scenarios. It is one strategy that may reduce status quo bias and temporal discounting by making more salient a variety of possible futures, and how they may differ from the present in both desirable and undesirable ways.}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Takeaways == | == Takeaways == | ||
| Line 69: | Line 66: | ||
|-|Examples= | |-|Examples= | ||
{{Example | |||
|Fundamental Attribution Error | |||
|If someone cuts us off while driving, our first thought might be “What a jerk!” instead of considering the possibility that the driver is rushing someone to the airport. On the flip side, when we cut someone off in traffic, we tend to convince ourselves that we had good reason to do so. We focus on situational factors, like being late to a meeting, and ignore what our behavior might say about our own character. | |||
{{ | |links={{LinkCard | ||
|url=https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/fundamental-attribution-error | |||
|title=Fundamental Attribution Error | |||
{{ | |description=Ethics Unwrapped glossary entry.}} | ||
}} | |||
{{Example | |||
|Conformity Bias | |||
|Studies show that people are more likely to act in a prosocial manner, such as contributing to charity or conserving water, if they see or hear that others are doing it too. However, it also works in the other direction, e.g. "cheating is contagious." | |||
|links={{LinkCard | |||
|url=https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/conformity-bias | |||
|title=Conformity Bias | |||
|description=Ethics Unwrapped glossary entry.}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Example | |||
|Obedience Bias | |||
|A physician ordered ear drops to be administered to the right ear of a patient suffering from pain and infection. Instead of writing out completely “Right ear” on the prescription, the doctor abbreviated it, “place in R ear.” The duty nurse misread “R ear” to be “Rear.” Upon receiving the prescription, she promptly put the required number of ear drops into the patient's anus without considering whether this was a sensible treatment for ear infection. | |||
|links={{LinkCard | |||
|url=https://www.amazon.in/Medication-Errors-Prevention-Neil-Davis/dp/0893130516 | |||
|title=Medication Errors: Causes and Prevention | |||
|description=Book cited as the source of this anecdote.}} | |||
|comments= | |||
{{BoxCaution|This story came up on many sites and is supposedly from the linked book but we haven't been able to verify it.}} | {{BoxCaution|This story came up on many sites and is supposedly from the linked book but we haven't been able to verify it.}} | ||
{{ | }} | ||
{{Example | |||
|Temporal Discounting | |||
|When asked if they'll take one cookie now or 3 cookies in 4 days people are more likely to take the cookie now. | |||
|comments= | |||
{{BoxTip|This is generally true for short time scales and small rewards but gets more nuanced otherwise. If the reward later is sufficiently bigger, people are generally willing to wait. For instance, people will take $10,000 in 2 months over $100 right now. There are also strong individual differences in temporal discounting.}} | {{BoxTip|This is generally true for short time scales and small rewards but gets more nuanced otherwise. If the reward later is sufficiently bigger, people are generally willing to wait. For instance, people will take $10,000 in 2 months over $100 right now. There are also strong individual differences in temporal discounting.}} | ||
}} | |||
|-|Common Misconceptions= | |-|Common Misconceptions= | ||
Latest revision as of 23:28, 11 June 2026
As social creatures, humans make decisions in the context of their social environment. This often leads to decisions that tend to conform with the group or obey those in authority, and to judgments that overemphasize the role of individual differences in explaining people's behaviors. We provoke a discussion on the implications of these cognitive biases to society and encourage empathy when judging others.
The Lesson in Context
This lesson is in the middle our "heuristics and biases" series and tends to be one of the more popular lessons in the course. It focusses on people's "hot" biases that are more emotionally or socially driven. Unfortunately, people that know about these biases are generally not actually less likely to fall into them. We choose to teach the students about them anyways.
Takeaways
After this lesson, students should
- Be wary of underestimating the influence of context or circumstance on human behavior (their own and others'). E.g. Circumstance excuses my bad behavior more than it excuses the bad behavior of others.
- Be aware of the pressure to conform, in oneself and others, and the difficulty of resisting this pressure.
- Be able to sort situations by the difficulty of resisting conformity, according to:
- Number of people conforming
- Identification with the group
- Confidence that the group is mistaken
- Presence or absence of a dissenter
- Be aware of the pressure to obey authority, in oneself and others.
- Be able to sort situations by the difficulty of resisting obedience, according to:
- Perceived authority of the "authority" giving instructions
- Proximity of the authority
- Proximity of the "victim"
- Presence of another disobeying
- Availability or salience of alternative, disobedient behaviors
Additional Learning Goals
What follows are additional learning goals that we would like to include, but aren't deeply covered in this discussion's lesson plan. We would like to cover them if we had more time.
- Predict that people will engage in temporal discounting when making decisions between something now vs. something later. E.g. People make decisions based on how good they think the outcomes will be, not based on when those outcomes will happen.
- Be wary of their own temptation to excessive temporal discounting when making decisions, choosing immediate rewards over longer term benefits. E.g. If I choose to get something less good that I can get sooner, it's always because I need it sooner.
- Be aware and wary of status quo bias. E.g. The way things are is the best way for things to be. Keeping things the way they are is safer.
- Understand not to assume the status quo is necessarily stable, even if we don't try to change it. E.g. It is possible to keep things just the way they are, and that is the most stable and predictable approach.
Fundamental Attribution Error
Conformity Bias
Obedience/Authority Bias
Temporal Discounting
- Hyperbolic Discounting
Fundamental Attribution Error
Conformity Bias
Obedience Bias
This story came up on many sites and is supposedly from the linked book but we haven't been able to verify it.
Temporal Discounting
This is generally true for short time scales and small rewards but gets more nuanced otherwise. If the reward later is sufficiently bigger, people are generally willing to wait. For instance, people will take $10,000 in 2 months over $100 right now. There are also strong individual differences in temporal discounting.
"It is easy for people to disobey when they think orders are unjust or wrong."
"It is easy to avoid conforming, I rarely conform."
Additional Content
You must be logged in to see this content.
